Showing posts with label glee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label glee. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2011

A look at the 2011 Emmy nominations

This morning the Emmy nominations were announced, and they were nothing super surprising. It had the usual nods to past-their-prime yet popular series and the requisite nod to one or two new cult shows.

Best Drama:

Boardwalk Empire
Friday Night Lights
Dexter
Game of Thrones
The Good Wife
Mad Men

I'm not sure if I'm surprised or not that "Justified" didn't sneak in there. While the performances were phenomenal, sometimes the story meandered and the female distractions on the show of the Winona variety didn't help. I am thrilled "The Walking Dead" didn't get a nod. Visually stunning, it just doesn't have the writing or acting to back it up. I don't quite get all the love for this show as it's always seemed cliche and bland to me.

Best Comedy:
Modern Family
30 Rock
Glee
The Office
The Big Bang Theory
Parks and Recreation

Yeah, I'm pretty ticked about the "Glee" nomination. I don't know what Emmy's problem is, but they seem to handle drama pretty well while having a hard time with comedy. They often repeatedly honor shows way past their prime which makes me feel like they don't even watch the shows regularly. "Community" and "Cougar Town" should be a slam dunk in this category. The inclusion of "Glee" over "Community" is, in my humble opinion, unforgivable. Kudos on the "Modern Family" love, though. I already foresee it winning again, as it should. It's one of the most consistent shows on this list.

Drama Actress:
Julianna Margulies, The Good Wife
Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men
Mariska Hargitay, Law & Order: SVU
Kathy Bates, Harry’s Law
Connie Britton, Friday Night Lights
Mireille Enos, The Killing.

I don't know who Mariska Hargitay is sleeping with to keep getting nominated every year. Probably the awards whore Tony Shaloub did. Anna Torv from "Fringe" should have taken that spot. Like John Noble, she ably handles two very different roles, displaying fantastic range. I'm really happy to see January Jones left out this time. After "X-Men: First Class," I'm convinced she, unlike Torv, does not have much range in her acting skills. I'm already predicting Margulies takes the award.

Comedy actor:
Steve Carell, The Office
Alec Baldwin, 30 Rock
Jim Parsons, Big Bang Theory
Matt LeBlanc, Episodes
Louis C.K., Louie
Johnny Galecki, Big Bang Theory

Drama actor:
Jon Hamm, Mad Men
Steve Buscemi, Boardwalk Empire
Kyle Chandler, Friday Night Lights
Michael C. Hall, Dexter
Hugh Laurie, House
Timothy Olyphant, Justified.

Nothing too bizarre here. In fact, were these practically the same nominations for the Golden Globes? No complaints on my part.

Comedy actress:
Tina Fey, 30 Rock
Edie Falco, Nurse Jackie
Amy Poehler, Parks and Recreation
Laura Linney, The Big C
Martha Plimpton, Raising Hope
Melissa McCarthy, Mike & Molly.

Supporting drama actor:
Andre Braugher, Men of a Certain Age
John Slattery, Mad Men
Alan Cumming, The Good Wife
Peter Dinklage, Game of Thrones
Josh Charles, The Good Wife
Walton Goggins, Justified.

While I don't think he had that much to do this year, I am beyond thrilled that Walton Goggins got a nomination. In some small way, it sort of kind of eases the pain of all the years he didn't get recognized for "The Shield." He owns any scene he's in and a nomination is well deserved. John Noble from "Fringe" should have been nominated, but I'm not entirely sure who to take off.

Supporting comedy actor:
Ty Burrell, Modern Family
Jesse Tyler Ferguson, Modern Family
Ed O’Neill, Modern Family
Eric Stonestreet, Modern Family
Jon Cryer, Two and a Half Men
Chris Colfer, Glee

I'll admit, I held out hope that Nolan Gould, the boy who plays Luke on "Modern Family" would get a nom. His comedic timing and delivery are perfect and he's often my favorite part of each episode. In lieu of him, I'm still cheering for Ty Burrell. He could split his own vote, though, considering all the (absolutely deserved) nominations for "Modern Family." Either Danny Pudi or Donald Glover from "Community" should have taken a spot. With so many standard sitcom characters around (the doofus, the horndog, the bimbo, the precocious kid), those two make a unique sitcom that much better with truly one-of-a-kind characters.

Supporting comedy actress:
Julie Bowen, Modern Family
Sofia Vergara, Modern Family
Jane Lynch, Glee
Betty White, Hot in Cleveland
Kristen Wiig, Saturday Night Live
Jane Krakowski, 30 Rock

Wow, they really dug deep for some nominations for this category and yet they still missed Busy Phillips' hilarious performance on "Cougar Town." She could have been the one-dimensional, stereotypical bimbo but she turns that character into so much more.

Supporting drama actress:
Archie Panjabi, The Good Wife
Kelly Macdonald, Boardwalk Empire
Christine Baranski, The Good Wife
Michelle Forbes, The Killing
Margo Martindale, Justified
Christina Hendricks, Mad Men.

I think there would have been riot if Martindale wasn't nominated. Furthermore, I think there might be a riot if she doesn't win. She was in a league of her own this year. I had no idea she could do what she did in making the truly terrifying mama bear of the Bennett clan.

As for the miniseries categories, it's really hard to take them seriously. I'm not saying there aren't worthy miniseries, but there are so few each year that they all get nominated because that's all there is to choose from.

Overall, I'd say the "Community" snubs bother me the most. I'd be okay if there was one or two noms just to acknowledge how great the underrated comedy is, but it was overlooked entirely. The Busy Phillips snub annoys me too, mainly because a lot of the actual nominees are in no way handing in better performances than her. The nomination that makes me the happiest is Walton Goggins for "Justified." It's nice to see a show sneak in there that doesn't have a rabid fan base like "Glee" to help put it in the public eye.

Okay, I lied. The snub that bothers me more than anything else is "Southland." Great cable shows without huge cult fanbases often get forgotten, but that doesn't mean they weren't great. Shawn Hatosy put in one of the best performances in drama television this year as Sammy Bryant, aka the detective having the worst year ever. Michael Cudlitz also stepped it up, portraying what could have been a one-note, gruff cop stereotype. Unlike "Community," it seems like the professional critical community forgot about "Southland" as well, despite more and more applauding it during its run.

At the end of the day, every year it's the same thing - I feel like the people voting in the Emmys barely watch TV.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Some last minute, pre-Emmy Emmy thoughts

The Emmys are this Sunday and I'm actually happy with the nominations. Well, happier than I've been in past years. Since lists of nominees are posted all over the Internet, I'm just going to list the categories I'm going to comment on.

Outstanding Drama Series
Lost
Breaking Bad
Dexter
Mad Men
True Blood
The Good Wife

I think we can just give this one to "Lost" right now, since the Emmys love to give send-off awards for shows that are leaving and had a lasting impact on popular culture. I really hope they don't do this, as I think "Lost" has seen better days and was rewarded for those better days already. This most recent season was rushed, uneven, and rather unfocused. You could feel the writers trying to wrap up storylines as quickly as they could to appease fans when we now know that there was no master plan all along and they just made up most of their answers just for the sake of answering something. Now, I wanted answers and a satisfying conclusion, but "Lost" was at its best when the focus was entirely on the characters. I would love to see "Dexter" finally get its due, especially since it came off a stellar season. I would hate to see "Dexter" never win the Emmys it deserves because it was eclipsed by bigger pop culture sensations. "Breaking Bad" or "Mad Men" are possibilities, neither of which would upset me. They're both excellent shows and they deserve the critical praise they get. The Emmys love "Mad Men," so I wouldn't rule that out completely. "True Blood" getting nominated was enough to make me gag, but I don't anticipate an upset. I regret to say I've never seen "The Good Wife" and can't really comment on it either way.

Outstanding Actor in a Drama
Jon Hamm (Mad Men)
Kyle Chandler (Friday Night Lights)
Bryan Cranston (Breaking Bad)
Hugh Laurie (House MD)
Michael C Hall (Dexter)
Matthew Fox (Lost)

Hamm, Fox and Laurie are consistently good, but Hall and Cranston are in a league of their own, in my humble opinion. I would bet Chandler is in the latter group as well, but I've never seen "Friday Night Lights." I'm a bad TV addict for this, I know, but all the critical praise in the world doesn't make me interested in some Texas football family small-town drama. Cranston would make me happiest for the win for his work on "Breaking Bad." I finally caught up with this show this summer and he is truly remarkable in that role.

Outstanding Guest Actor in a Drama Series
Beau Bridges (The Closer)
Ted Danson (Damages)
John Lithgow (Dexter)
Alan Cumming (The Good Wife)
Dylan Baker (The Good Wife)
Robert Morse (Mad Men)
Gregory Itzin (24)

I'm still biased because of my love of "Dexter," but this really should be John Lithgow's award. Critics and viewers alike were blown away by his role as the Trinity killer. He should win the award just for the Thanksgiving episode alone.

Outstanding Guest Actress in a Drama Series
Mary Kay Place (Big Love)
Sissy Spacek (Big Love)
Shirley Jones (The Cleaner)
Lily Tomlin (Damages)
Ann-Margret (Law & Order: SVU)
Elizabeth Mitchell (Lost)

The only reason I list this one is because of Elizabeth Mitchell's nomination. Seriously? I love her, and I loved her in past seasons, but did she even have fifteen minutes of screen time in the last season?

Outstanding Comedy
Glee
Modern Family
Curb Your Enthusiasm
Nurse Jackie
30 Rock
The Office

By now, everyone knows this is a race between "Modern Family" and "Glee." I can't shake the feeling that "Glee" is going to take it because of the media adoration, but "Modern Family" was consistently funny and well written. I'm no fan of "Glee," but I did watch most of the season in an effort to see what people love about it. I can understand its appeal for a certain demographic, but the show is very uneven and, with the exception of Jane Lynch's love-it-or-hate-it snarky bitch role, it's just not that funny.

Outstanding Actor in a Comedy
Larry David (Curb Your Enthusiasm)
Alec Baldwin (30 Rock)
Matthew Morrison (Glee)
Steve Carell (The Office)
Jim Parsons (The Big Bang Theory)
Tony Shalhoub (Monk)

I only posted this list because of the craziness that is Tony Shalhoub getting nominated again. Did "Monk" even air this year? I'm not as invested in the comedies as I am the dramas just by nature of what shows I watch, but I don't want to see him take this award one more time, even if it is the last time he could.

Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy
Chris Colfer (Glee)
Neil Patrick Harris (How I Met Your Mother)
Jesse Tyler Ferguson (Modern Family)
Jon Cryer (Two and a Half Men)
Eric Stonestreet (Modern Family)
Ty Burrell (Modern Family)

Someone from "Two and a Half Men" must have some incriminating information or something, because someone has to be getting blackmailed for that show to keep getting Emmy recognition. There are a lot of people behind Colfer, and he is funny sometimes on that show, but I have a hard time getting past the character as it's such a complete and total stereotype walking. Same with Lea Michele and her character. I feel like people have pulled off their cliche characters better in other programs. I think this award should and probably will go to Ty Burrell for his work as Phil Dunphy. He nails that character, and much as I love Stonestreet, Burrell is the stand-out. The clever writing helps, but it would be nothing without Burrell's absolutely spot-on delivery.

I have nothing to say about reality, as I don't watch any, but I'm still really pissed that "Torchwood: Children of Earth" wasn't nominated for the miniseries category. I can't blame this on the Emmys, however, since The Powers That Be didn't submit "Torchwood" for consideration. I don't understand this for one second. The five-part miniseries was brilliant and deserves recognition. It should go down in television history as one of the best sci-fi programs ever just for the recent miniseries event.

As far as snubs go, "Cougar Town" is my most egregious snub. Busy Phillipps should have been nominated, without a doubt. Emmy voters should know better than to be turned off by a bad title. I'd also add "Ugly Betty" and, more specifically, Vanessa Williams to the snub list. The show had a creative resurgence in its last season and Williams was always excellent, as was Michael Urie. The Emmys keep giving "Monk" awards and even recognized Kristin Chenoweth's performance on the by-then deceased "Pushing Daisies" last year so "Ugly Betty" shouldn't have been overlooked just because it's over. It's also refreshing this year to see some deserved snubs, like "Grey's Anatomy" and "Desperate Housewives" being largely ignored. And rightly so. I love those shows still, but they didn't deserve nominations.

I'll most likely return with a post-Emmys article, reviewing what thrilled me and what enraged me. I'm not expecting much from the host this year, since it's Jimmy Fallon. But anyone is better than reality show hosts.

Monday, July 12, 2010

"Rizzoli & Isles" - everything I can't stand about procedurals

For the most part, I really can't stand procedurals. I don't understand how people can watch multiple "CSI"s or "Law & Order"s or how Mariska Hargitay can keep getting nominated for Emmys for a role on a procedural. It's a reliable formula, repetitive yet comfortable. It's hard for a network to take a chance on something different, especially when procedurals are so lucrative. For every "Glee," there's a hundred more "Pushing Daisies" or "Eli Stones." A network doesn't care how critically acclaimed a show is if there are no ratings to back it up.

Every single piece of promotion for the new TNT show "Rizzoli & Isles" makes me want to rip my hair out it frustrates me so much. First of all, it sounds like a complete rip-off of "Bones." And about a million other shows. How unique! You're pairing up a tough street-smart cop with a brainy scientist? But that will never work! They're complete opposites! Oh wait, but this time they're both women! On the plus side, I guess that counts out the requisite sexual tension between the lead characters, unless TNT feels like going nuts and making the most cliched concept into something totally different.

The character cliches are what bother me the most. You have the standard opposites attract cliches piled onto female cliches. On television and in movies, the only way a woman is a cop is if she is a tomboy who grew up with lots of brothers, was a military brat, is a lesbian, or has daddy issues. A recent promo in "People" magazine features an ad campaign with pictures of the two women as children with a description of their respective personalities. Rizzoli, the cop, loved "beating her brothers at basketball and armwrestling" as a kid. She liked "shooting a BB gun" and says "When I grow up, I want to find bad guys and put them in jail." On the other side of the page, we have Isles, who loves "reading and solving puzzles." She's the booksmart one who sees the world in scientific terms. She's socially awkward, naturally, but damn good at her work.

Cue the show. I bet there will be plenty of banter about how bizarre they find each others' way of viewing the world. I bet the streetsmart cop will say something humorous about how the other uses way too much unnecessary technical jargon. I bet the booksmart scientist will roll her eyes or make a humorous comment about her need to explain every tiny thing to her partner. I bet the cop will be brash and sometimes too reckless for her own good. I bet the scientist will be the cool-headed one who reminds her partner to calm down and look at the facts.

It's probably pretty obvious that I won't be watching this show, which debuts tonight at 10:00. It embodies every stereotype and cliche regarding cops and women that I hate about procedurals. I'm so sick of the booksmart/streetsmart clash of personalities partnership concept. It's been a long time since that concept was fresh and funny. Unlikely partners? Maybe if this was 1970. (The show gets one tiny bonus point for casting Lee Thompson Young. The famous Jett Jackson needs a better gig on TV these days, especially after "FlashForward" killed him off in such an annoying way.)


Wednesday, June 16, 2010

My Top 10: Unfairly Hated TV Characters

One of the unfortunate products of the Internet is the fact that people are allowed to spew all sorts of hate in comfortable anonymity. Now, I take TV kind of seriously but I also realize it's all fiction intended for our entertainment. Other people, however, take things very seriously and apparently get very worked up over certain plotlines or characters. I've noticed that a lot of characters that get chastised for being annoying are often very realistically written and perhaps people just don't want to spend time with fictional people who whine and complain just as much as real people do. I also love the irony of people complaining about characters who complain too much. Some of the hate heaped on certain characters is, in my opinion, unwarranted. And when I say hate, I don't mean so-bad-it's-good, love-to-hate hate. I mean hate-to-hate, revulsion, cancel-this-monstrosity-now-it's-burning-my-eyes-out hate. So I made a list, in increasing order of unfair hatred, to defend some of them. The standard caveat applies: I can only cover shows that I'm familiar with. I'm sure there are plenty more unfairly reviled characters, so feel free to comment away with other suggestions.

10. Susan Meyer (Teri Hatcher) from
"Desperate Housewives"
There's a LOT of hate for this character, even more than the hate for everyone else on this show. I think most of it stems from a general hatred out there towards Teri Hatcher for some reason. I'd like to clarify that I don't even like Susan Meyer - in fact, she irritates me quite a bit when her neurotic side takes over (which is, let's face it, often). But I also find her neurotic disposition and gossipy lifestyle to be painfully realistic sometimes. These qualities are exaggerated for comic effect, but I think there are plenty of people in the real world who are just as annoying. People get really nasty about this character because of lots of reasons that combine into one giant force of annoying. Lots of people hate Teri Hatcher. Lots of people love to hate "Desperate Housewives," since it's cool to bash it and try to make yourself look smart and superior. Lots of people hate Susan because she's silly, clumsy, and immature. Some complaints on this subject are warranted, but it shouldn't take the nasty form it often does.

9. Luke Danes (Scott Patterson) from
"Gilmore Girls"
I put this one low on the list because it's a rather dated reference by now. Luke is a good example of character assassination because the writers demanded it but didn't bother to make it realistic at all. After Luke and Lorelai finally got together, the writers decided they needed obstacles, so they threw in Luke's long-lost daughter April, a lispy precocious young teen who drove a wedge between the couple. As that season progressed, Luke became more and more distant as he kept Lorelai and April apart for no reason whatsoever leading Lorelai to eventually explode and run into her ex's arms. While I hated Luke during the season or two he became even more crotchety than normal, I think the hatred by a lot of fans was unfair. His change in personality was out-of-character and completely contrived. It was the kind of personality change where it takes you out of the show to the point where you can hear the writers pondering "hmmm....should we bother giving them an organic conflict that leads to a satisfying resolution and deepens their relationship? Nah, let's just make Luke act like an ass so we can have fun with Christopher again! We already know Luke and Lorelai will end up together at the end of the series, so let's not bother worrying about things like consistent characterization."

8. Mohinder Suresh (Sendhil Ramamurthy) from
"Heroes"

People really started to hate Mohinder. I might be a little biased in my opinion since I had a major crush on him and I stopped watching the show for a while when he finally got more storyline, but I still think he was unfairly reviled. To lots of people, he came off as preachy and ineffective. But he was one of the only people on the show with no powers, the cast of the show was huge and he wasn't given enough screen-time to flesh out his character, and the brief arc where he was pals with Sylar (when he didn't know it was Sylar) certainly didn't do him any favors. Now, I missed the storyline of him getting his own powers somehow, so maybe it was awful and he deserved the hatred for that, but a lot of the hate was spewed before that season and I just felt really bad for him.

7. Grace Adler (Debra Messing) from
"Will & Grace"

Grace is the type of character you either like and enjoy or find grating and dislike. She's the standard neurotic, flustered female you get on a sitcom. This definitely falls under the category of "if you loathe the main character, why are you watching this show?" "Will & Grace" is a sitcom - you're pretty much ensured this kind of character. I feel like the kind of people who go around talking about how much they hate a character like Grace are the kind of people who feel like they have some sort of obligation to humanity to convince everyone that the show sucks as much as they think it does, even though every person is completely free to watch or not watch depending on how they feel on the subject.

6. Jack McFarland (Sean Hayes) from
"Will & Grace"

Once again, you know what you're getting into with a sitcom - wacky characters. I'm in the camp of people who love Jack. But I can understand where some people are coming from in hating him. He's played as a stereotype and a lot of the humor on "Will & Grace" comes from stereotyping. But once again, it's a sitcom. Almost every sitcom has some sort of stereotypical character. I don't see people up in arms over "Glee" reinforcing stereotypes of drama queens and gay characters, yet I know "Will & Grace" received plenty of criticism for this. The way I see it, it was a groundbreaking sitcom still held back by a time period of considerable homophobia. And while the characters were often stereotypes, they were also endearing, funny, heartwarming, and compassionate friends. Jack may have been a stereotype, but he was not a negative character by any means.

5. Violet Turner (Amy Brenneman) from
"Private Practice"

Violet shares a lot in common with Meredith Grey in that they're both characters with dark pasts who are not immediately likeable to the unforgiving viewer. I was surprised how many people hoped Violet would be the one to get killed off in the season finale since I don't think she's that insufferable. She went through a major traumatic experience! Some mourning time and recovery is warranted here. Her romantic entanglements I can take or leave, but I actually enjoyed her storyline when it involved her trauma and the custody battle over Lucas. I was especially glad that, instead of getting nasty and staying there, the Oceanside group got nasty for a while, then felt bad and rose above it. Violet dealt with her situation in a mature manner - she understood she had to get better before she could be entrusted with Lucas, yet she demanded her rights as a mother. I think most people on the outside of the show find everyone in the cast insufferable, but the people who can stand the show and enjoy it on a certain soapy level have no reason to hate Violet in particular, in my humble opinion.

4. Meredith Grey (Ellen Pompeo) from
"Grey's Anatomy"

This is just a character that lots of people don't like. But since she's the star of the show, complaints about Meredith often lead me to wonder once again, "then why are you watching the show?" Many people hate the voiceover device. I like it when used well but I don't mind it so much to the point of hatred even if it's vague and adds nothing to the show. Physically, Ellen Pompeo isn't a stunner and I do have a hard time imagining guys fighting over her. She's like primetime TV's version of Bella Swan (although that may be a bit too harsh. Okay, extremely harsh). And personality-wise, she isn't the most fun either. But I find her to be a realistic character in the way her dark and twisty-ness comes out. She complains about legitimate things most of the time - like her issues with her mother's affair, her father's abandonment, and all sorts of other family trauma. She's not the most immediately likeable character, but I think there's something human about her in that, once you get to know her, her eccentricities make sense and her dark attitude becomes justified. Also, I give "Grey's Anatomy" and Meredith major points for allowing the character to change and evolve over the years. Meredith isn't still doing the same dark and twisty routine she did in early seasons. She's married, she's matured, and dealt with many of her childhood traumas. She's got a good relationship with Lexie and her marriage to Derek is surprisingly - dare I say it? - healthy.

3. Daniel Shaw (Brandon Routh) from
"Chuck"

This one might be pretty controversial for "Chuck" fans. I was by no means a fan of Shaw, but I think this is another case of The Powers That Be influencing the narrative negatively. I could understand just not liking him - Brandon Routh is like handsome cardboard. And I could understand not liking him for coming between Sarah and Chuck. And maybe it's my own opinion, but I never felt like Shaw was that big a threat. Romantically with Sarah, he never had the same charm and magnetism that Bryce Larkin did. I knew that he was thrown in to give Chuck and Sarah another obstacle, I knew that Sarah was afraid of getting involved with Chuck and afraid of what Chuck was becoming so she might find solace in fellow spy Shaw, and I knew that Chuck and Sarah would end up together anyway. So yes, I understand he wasn't a likeable character, but I think people went way overboard with how much they despised him. I think this backlash was more from the Shipper fans, who couldn't stand to see anyone come between Chuck and Sarah. (Oh, and to note: this was my attitude before he became the finale villain and killed Chuck and Ellie's father. Then we were supposed to loathe him. I'm talking about the period before, when we were supposed to accept him as a team member. Later, I loved-to-hate him since he gave us some epic Chuck vs. Shaw action).

2. Martha Jones (Freema Agyeman) from
"Doctor Who"
Poor Freema had a very tough position. She had to follow the beloved Rose Tyler played by Billie Piper. She was also saddled with a forced crush on the Doctor that was, of course, not going to end well. In retrospect, she gets an even worse rap since people adored Donna Noble as played by Brit comedian Catherine Tate. One of the biggest disadvantages Freema had was being an unknown. While unknown to us US viewers, both Billie Piper and Catherine Tate were already famous before being cast as companions and therefore already had solid fan bases. Freema didn't get this luxury and ended up with an uphill battle to win fan support. I personally think Donna is as overrated as it gets. People loved her habit of "knocking the Doctor off his high horse, calling him on his mistakes, and generally keeping him grounded." I hated her habit of being an annoying bitch most of the time. (She had her highlights though. I actually really loved her in "Partners in Crime" and "Turn Left.") Martha was smart, driven, and an asset to the Doctor. It was about time to have a companion who wasn't a doe-eyed worshipper of the Doctor, but Martha wasn't the fluttery preteen-like fangirl that many "Doctor Who" fans make her out to be. If nothing else, I think she should get major points for being gorgeous. Not to be entirely shallow, but she did have redeeming qualities on a purely physical level! (And now that I sound like a lesbian creeper....on to number one!)

1. Rita Bennett/Morgan (Julie Benz) from
"Dexter"
The inspiration for this list. It's a little late coming since most of the hatred was released in the wake of her death as people everywhere declared "good riddance." Me, I could never understand why people hated or even just didn't like her. I loved her with Dexter and loved seeing how he became a better person when he was with her. Most, if not all, of the complaints came from Rita's purported "nagging" of Dexter. Apparently people think a wife should be perfectly fine with her husband being gone at all hours of the night or gone on secret trips, even if he's had a history of leaving you for another woman amidst a heroin addiction. What a pain in the ass, a woman wanting to know where the man she loves is! What a nagging bitch, asking you to commit to your family! I wasn't thrilled when she got killed off and hope her character gets a proper send-off on-screen, since many "Dexter" fans celebrated her off-ing. Rest in peace, Rita.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

"Lost" - I loved the series finale. I also hated it.

I think this is the first time I truly understand the meaning of the words "finale fever." I'm starting to recover and collect my thoughts though. I thought I'd tackle the most daunting finale first: "Lost." But how to do it? I could go the EW route and write a giant, philosophical essay about "what it all meant" and how poignant it all was. I could do bullet points and not even bother to form coherent sentences. I could do a stream of consciousness entry with plenty of expletives that would make JD Salinger proud. Well, I'm going to go ahead and write and you can be the judge of whether it makes sense or not. And I'll admit right now, I am not one of those crazed "Lost" fans who watches episodes a dozen times to search for hidden meaning and then consorts with their online cronies to discuss what it all means. I'm one of the fans who is along for the ride and enjoys it, but to a healthy degree. I say this in the intro as I have never seen the phrase "if you were a true fan..." bandied about so much before in my life as I have in "Lost" discussions these past few days.
I'm going to get right down to it. The revelation of the Sideways world as purgatory. More than that, it seemed to be more purgatory from Jack's point of view as it all went on. Everything that happened on the Island was real, Sideways world was not. This disappointed me immensely, and not just because it was what everyone sort of predicted in the beginning. It was almost like they went down the list of cliche series endings and said, "hmmm, well people really hate the 'it was all a dream' scenario. What's the next best thing? They all died!" I'll let that slide for the most part. If they had all died in the initial plane crash? That would have been unforgiveable. But I hated this reveal for a number of reasons. I thought one commentor summed it up the best: "If you're the Man of Faith, you loved the ending. If you're the Man of Science, you hated it." That's very black-and-white, but it's kind of true. I'm the (Wo)Man of Science, so it was admittedly frustrating for me to see the finale veer so much into the Faith territory. Until now, I thought the series had always done a good job of balancing the two and maintaining an interesting conflict. But in the end, Jack even admits that John Locke, Man of Faith, was right about almost everything. And then Jack discovers he is in Sideways world aka Purgatory and everyone is waiting for him so they can move on into the light. To many people, this is a very satisfying ending. For me, this was not the happy ending I was hoping for. For me, the Sideways world being real was satisfying. In that world, everyone got their happy endings with the people they loved. I viewed it as an alternate universe they created after the hydrogen bomb exploded and Desmond was brought in to help them snap back to that consciousness. All those reunions in Sideways world were incredibly touching so the purgatory revelation, to me, invalidated all those reunions. Going into the light is not a satisfying ending in my book. Getting your happily ever after is. Suddenly Juliet's sacrifice is meaningless. Suddenly Faraday looks like an idiot. For a show that took so much time explaining things in scientific terms, what with all the time travel and constants and electromagnetism, it felt like a cop-out to abandon logical explanations and settle on supernatural, spiritual forces.

Ignoring whether or not the ending was satisfying because of its focus on faith, I feel like the Sideways as purgatory storyline completely distracted people from all those other questions they had about the Island to begin with. It was established that everything that happened to Jack on the Island happened, so what about the Dharma Initiative? What about Widmore? What about the Others? What about the Light on the Island? What about Walt? What about WALT?!

Maybe it was naive of me, but I had hoped the writers knew what they were doing. I mean, I had hoped they had some ultimate blueprint for the narrative which is what prompted them to set a specific end date. I really believed that they had an explanation for these things, that they weren't just adding twists and mysteries just for the sake of being mysterious. A show that demonstrates what I had hoped is "Doctor Who," the new series. I know the seasons are much shorter, but they manage to have fun, adventure-of-the-week episodes with mythology thrown in. In the second episode of season 1, the first Bad Wolf reference is made. In the third season, the very first episode contains a Vote Saxon poster. Every season of "Doctor Who" has a clear narrative determined before they start writing themselves into corners. There are other shows that do this, and I had hoped that "Lost" would be one. That they would ultimately have some explanation that ties everything together about the mysteries of the Island. But no. Then comes the person who says "sit back, relax, of course they're not going to answer every question! How very demanding you are! Leave some things open to interpretation! Don't you see the genius in that?" But I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for some answers to make it seem like they weren't just throwing in lots of strange elements without a rhyme or reason. At some point, "leaving things open to interpretation" isn't genius and artsy, it's just not bothering to answer your questions.

Well, now that I've alienated any person who enjoyed the finale and thinks I'm an overly critical hateful shrew, I'd like to talk about some things I did like. As I said, I loved the series finale too. For the first two hours, in fact, when I still thought the main characters were going to transition into the Sideways world and get their happy endings, I really really loved the finale. Every awakening was emotionally powerful to watch. My favorite awakening was initially Jin and Sun's. Their death together was so jarring and unexpected that their awakening in the hospital, hearing that their baby was just fine and they were together and well was thrilling in its beauty. And then Sawyer and Juliet awoke near the hospital vending machines and it was even better. The juxtaposition with the scenes of Juliet's death and her new life, as it were, were fantastic. What a fool I was to think that so many characters would get their happy endings with their loved ones. I, like many other fans, had some problems with Sayid ending up with Shannon when Nadia was his true love, but it was so damn endearing that I let that slide. I was a little sad for Desmond, however, as he was too busy waking people up to have some grand reunion with Penelope. Their scenes together are always the most moving, but I guess with the Purgatory resolution it really wouldn't have made sense to stop everything and make it about them when, really, it ended up being all about Jack and his perspective. But the Kate, Claire, and Charlie awakening was just as touching as the others. I also loved that Lapidus, Sawyer, Miles, Kate, and Claire managed to get the plane off the Island. However, this was when I started getting confused and was forced to confront that my Sideways theory was most likely wrong. I also loved Sideways Kate pointing out the humor in Jack's dad being named "Christian Shepard." I loved the final shot of Jack's eye closing to end the show. I love that ABC admitted that the final shots of the Oceanic wreckage were tacked on as a breather before the news rather than parts of the show.

It's funny, writing this now and thinking back on what I THOUGHT was going to happen and what REALLY happened. I thought that the big ending would be that everyone gets to live. Everyone gets to live, everyone gets a happy ending, and people would complain because it was too perfect. But no. Everyone died. Not all at the same time, granted, but everyone was dead in the end. But in the eyes of the spiritual, the ending really was pretty happy. To believers, the ending was just. "Man of Faith is content here. So what's your problem, you cynical Man of Science? Why should the 'Lost' finale cater to your fringe beliefs?" Well, I am glad that the ending was emotionally resonant and had the ultimate theme of live together, die alone, but then move on into the light together too. But I'm a little let down that the finale had to get that divisive in the first place. Yes, no matter what it was, it would be divisive, but nothing is quite so polarizing as spirituality and religion. So inherent in the fact that they ended the series in a decidedly spiritual manner, it is likely to bother people who aren't of a spiritual inclination. I know many people who are not spiritual but still loved the finale and could still appreciate it. I think I can appreciate the beauty in the ending, even if it didn't completely satisfy me. I know that the Light in the church is supposed to be a good thing, so I should find solace in that. It's not MY happy ending, but it is a happy ending nonetheless.
Thanks for the memories, "Lost." You were never an obsession of mine, but you made the Top Ten list consistently. Now we just have to deal with all the annoying people asking what show is going to be the next "Lost." Which, I think, is unfair to any promising shows with great potential as people will assess it in terms of the "Lost" greatness formula. And no, none of them will be the next "Lost" because "Lost" is unique. But in terms of phenomenon, I'm sure something will come along in the near future. Who knows, what with "Glee" being renewed for a second and third season, maybe everyone will get onboard with that and people over the age of 23 will be head over heels about it. Or something amazing will come to HBO or Showtime or some other cable network that will have the creative vision and ingenuity to take the nation and world by storm. (I'm hoping for the latter.)

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

"No One Takes Your Freedom" - a mashup made in heaven

I haven't heard many music mashups before. Apparently there's a long and storied history of smushing together different songs in a way that isn't just a crappy remix version. Currently, "Glee" is making use of mashups and people are absolutely head over heels for it. (I guess all TV had to do was include popular music sung musical theater-style and the coveted 18-49 demo would be crazy in love). Anywho, I came across something wonderful when downloading the Scissor Sisters' albums the other month, and it was "No One Takes Your Freedom" by DJ Earworm. He routinely mixes "United States of Pop," which blends top 40 music each year. While I enjoyed those, they seem a little forced at times. "Freedom," on the other hand, feels like all these songs were just waiting to be put together into one epic anthem. In order, it combines "Take Your Mama" by the Scissor Sisters, "For No One" by the Beatles, "Freedom '90" by George Michael (the new one, not the Wham song), and "Think" by Aretha Franklin. The result is pretty awesome. (Then again, I am supremely biased since I adore the Scissor Sisters and George Michael). Take a listen below and decide for yourself.